|Rapport - Rogers, Politiken Cup, 2014|
21 July, 2014
05 July, 2014
Finally, after a number of delays, Chess Cafe is back !
I have no idea what the makeover was about, since to my eyes the website has the same layout, and has exactly the same columnists ( saying more-or-less the same things as 6 months ago ! ) but maybe the important changes are "under the bonnet" .
The column I enjoy the most ( Tim Harding's ' The Kibitzer' ) has been continued at his own site during the break, so I didn't suffer too much from the enforced break !
I love his combination of chess + history, and the fact that he displays older games ( often played in a simpler and more understandable style ) from which you can learn. His writing is also fluid,and his chess analysis easy to follow.
The first-returning columns include those of the the two Opening experts ( Abby Marshall and Gary Lane) , both of which hold very little interest for me. Occasionally, I will take a peek, but not that often.
Another I avoid is the ' Chess Evoloution' by Arkadij Naiditsch : far too advanced for this patzer !
I will be eagerly awaiting Karsten Mullers' " Endgame Corner" . Not so much fun as seeing him on his Endgame DVDs, where his style is incredibly educative, as well as highly amusing, but well worthwhile.
Similarly, Dan Heiseman's "Novice Nook" will be good to read again. Homely and informative.
The book and product reviews are welcome and interesting to read, but I admit that the Chessbase and sometimes the Convekta/Aquarium section ( when it was there ) were largely not for me .
Although they gave some interesting information ( particularly in Aquarium , as it developed its new ideas on Interactive Deep Analysis ) most of the time I could not comprehend why these columns wrote about such basic usage of the product. Does no-one read a manual any more ?
One column ( or perhaps more correctly, author ) I will undoubtedly still miss is Nigel Davies, whose "Middlegame Motifs' and "Let's take a look" columns were wonderful, but have not been seen on Chess Cafe for some time.
Luckily, the Archives section at Chess Cafe is still available so if you navigate to here and here, all those instructive middlegame columns are still available to enjoy.
You never know, maybe as July unfolds and more columns are published, new columnists or ideas will be revealed : just have to wait and see !
07 June, 2014
In this game, I had just found some space for my Queen after many stressful moves of being close to trapped.
I'd expected White to exchange Queens on c2, but instead he played Qa3.
The exchange of pieces proposed seemed fine for me, and finally resolved the Queen issue.
So, what to play now in response to Qa3?
I chose, not necessarily a ' wrong' move, but certainly not the best.
And you ?
|Black to Play|
05 June, 2014
A further newspaper selection.
|5 June, 1921 : White to play and Mate in 2|
02 June, 2014
I missed a vital part of this problem, and chose a wrong solution.
I did, in fact, see part of the solution, but since I didn't recognise the concept, naturally I failed to solve it.
My solution would, if this was a real game, have put me in a more-or-less equal position, but there is more to be gained from it...
|White to play|
29 May, 2014
|1921 : White to play and Mate in 2|